| SOFTBALL TIPS |
|
|
|
| SITE STUFF |
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVES
|
| |
June 26, 2005 |
| |
July 03, 2005 |
| |
July 10, 2005 |
| |
July 17, 2005 |
| |
July 24, 2005 |
| |
July 31, 2005 |
| |
August 07, 2005 |
| |
August 14, 2005 |
| |
August 21, 2005 |
| |
August 28, 2005 |
| |
September 11, 2005 |
| |
October 02, 2005 |
| |
October 09, 2005 |
| |
October 23, 2005 |
| |
October 30, 2005 |
| |
November 06, 2005 |
| |
November 13, 2005 |
| |
December 04, 2005 |
| |
December 18, 2005 |
| |
December 25, 2005 |
| |
January 08, 2006 |
| |
January 15, 2006 |
| |
January 29, 2006 |
| |
February 05, 2006 |
| |
February 12, 2006 |
| |
February 19, 2006 |
| |
February 26, 2006 |
| |
March 05, 2006 |
| |
March 12, 2006 |
| |
March 19, 2006 |
| |
March 26, 2006 |
| |
April 02, 2006 |
| |
April 09, 2006 |
| |
April 16, 2006 |
| |
April 23, 2006 |
| |
April 30, 2006 |
| |
May 07, 2006 |
| |
May 14, 2006 |
| |
May 21, 2006 |
| |
May 28, 2006 |
| |
June 04, 2006 |
| |
June 11, 2006 |
| |
June 18, 2006 |
| |
June 25, 2006 |
| |
July 09, 2006 |
| |
July 16, 2006 |
| |
July 23, 2006 |
| |
July 30, 2006 |
| |
August 13, 2006 |
| |
August 20, 2006 |
| |
September 03, 2006 |
| |
September 10, 2006 |
| |
September 17, 2006 |
| |
September 24, 2006 |
| |
October 01, 2006 |
| |
October 08, 2006 |
| |
October 15, 2006 |
| |
October 22, 2006 |
| |
November 12, 2006 |
| |
November 26, 2006 |
| |
December 31, 2006 |
| |
January 14, 2007 |
| |
January 21, 2007 |
| |
January 28, 2007 |
| |
February 04, 2007 |
| |
February 11, 2007 |
| |
February 18, 2007 |
| |
February 25, 2007 |
| |
March 04, 2007 |
| |
March 11, 2007 |
| |
March 18, 2007 |
| |
April 01, 2007 |
| |
April 08, 2007 |
| |
April 15, 2007 |
| |
April 22, 2007 |
| |
April 29, 2007 |
| |
May 06, 2007 |
| |
May 13, 2007 |
| |
May 20, 2007 |
| |
May 27, 2007 |
| |
June 03, 2007 |
| |
June 10, 2007 |
| |
June 17, 2007 |
| |
June 24, 2007 |
| |
July 01, 2007 |
| |
July 22, 2007 |
| |
July 29, 2007 |
| |
August 12, 2007 |
| |
August 19, 2007 |
| |
September 02, 2007 |
| |
September 16, 2007 |
| |
September 30, 2007 |
| |
October 07, 2007 |
| |
October 14, 2007 |
| |
October 21, 2007 |
| |
November 04, 2007 |
| |
November 18, 2007 |
| |
November 25, 2007 |
| |
December 02, 2007 |
| |
December 09, 2007 |
| |
December 16, 2007 |
| |
January 13, 2008 |
| |
February 17, 2008 |
| |
February 24, 2008 |
| |
March 02, 2008 |
| |
March 09, 2008 |
| |
March 30, 2008 |
| |
April 06, 2008 |
| |
April 13, 2008 |
| |
April 20, 2008 |
| |
April 27, 2008 |
| |
May 04, 2008 |
| |
May 11, 2008 |
| |
May 18, 2008 |
| |
May 25, 2008 |
| |
June 01, 2008 |
| |
June 15, 2008 |
| |
June 22, 2008 |
| |
June 29, 2008 |
| |
July 06, 2008 |
| |
July 13, 2008 |
| |
July 20, 2008 |
| |
August 03, 2008 |
| |
August 10, 2008 |
| |
August 17, 2008 |
| |
August 24, 2008 |
|
|
| SOFTBALL LINKS |
|
|
|
Practicing To Make Great Plays
by Dave
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
I am a firm believer in doing repetitious, mundane plays in practice. I like the concept of a player fielding 100 ordinary grounders every day. I like throwing drills to all bases performed many times, over and over again. This is a reaction sport in which a player does not want to stop and think in the middle of a play. She needs to have performed each particular skill thousands of times in practice. But if you (team or individual) want to stand out from the crowd, perhaps something more is required.
There are all sorts of mundane plays which any good player must execute properly in games. Fielding balls to the right, left and right at you; making throws to the left, right, home, etc.; shuffle throws, crow hops, catching balls while on the run, these are all important skills which arise on everyday ordinary plays and must be made routinely, with a success rate, if one is to step up and be a player. There are countless other plays which should be made too. Some of these are slight variations of mundane plays and some of these are more advanced. But we seldom see such things worked on in practice and I'm not sure why.
Before I get into this, many will see these plays and say, there's nothing extraordinary about them. I make (my daughter makes / my team makes) plays like that routinely. We practice those all the time. That may be but not everyone thinks along those lines and few teams actually practice any of it.
The best example of a play which is just ouside the mundane happens when a shortstop goes to her knees on a ball up the middle. That is considered to be routine by many a good shortstop. But a 12U or 14U SS may not ever practice such a play. The best do but most do not.
There are a couple aspects to making a play when diving to the grounder up the middle. For one thing, there is the dive and making the judgment that I am going to get this ball if and only if I dive. That takes experience. I understand the need to field 100 balls in front, just to either side, etc. But at some point, the quality SS needs to have enough repetitions on balls just outside her reach, unless she dives, to distinguish such plays. You sometimes see infielders even at the highest levels fail to recognize quickly enough a ball they must dive for. The more practice, the better!
The dive itself needs work in terms of posture, footwork, laying out, and getting the ball. I won't give you a mechanical diagram for this - that's beyond my scope here. You can handle this. Watch a bunch of shortstops laying out for balls and copy their movements.
Now, our intrepid SS knows when to dive for a ball up the middle. She is skilled at diving and makes the play on the ball most of the time. But she hasn't got anyone out yet. After the grounder is caught, she needs to get up and make the throw, or learn to throw from her knees. That's simple enough but she needs to do it and repeat it so she gets the right feel. This whole exercise requires repetition. And the very best shortstops do this in practice. They don't just jump out onto the field with all that natural talent and make spectacular plays.
Other similar drills need to be worked for all infield positions and it is nearly impossible to list them all here. I'll just mention some of these because I know you are smart enough to identify important but nonmundane plays and then devise drills for them.
A similar drill to the above needs to be run for the second baseman who has to dive to her right on balls up the middle. She'll also need drills for balls to her left which require a dive. And she will possibly need to work on making throws from her knees and/or one knee. The shortstop is going to need work on plays in the hole. And lest I forget, they are going to need to make these plays followed by throws to each of the bases, including home.
It may seem counter-intuitive for a shortstop to need to go into the hole and then make a throw to home but comnsider a hard shot line-drive in which the SS dives and knocks down the ball while the runner from third retreats to avoid being doubled off and then breaks for home when the ball hits dirt. A good throw needs to be made to nail her, a good practiced throw!
Similarly, the third baseman needs to be able to dive on hard smashes, retrieve the ball, and then make a throw to any of the bases or maybe get up and step on third. We see these plays all the time. We marvel at the athleticism of the fielder when she records an out as the result of some spectacular diving stab. But when she gets up and throws the ball over the first baseman's head or fails to make any play recording an out, we yawn and think, "that was a nice play but...." Throws from the dirt on good plays must be followed by a putout in order to really gain notice! And like any other throw, these should be practiced.
There are two kindred plays a third baseman can make to stand out from the crowd. One involves the ball that nagging slapper bounces into the dirt. She pounds the ball so hard that it doesn't come down to earth in time for you to even attempt a throw. Well, she does have 1.3 speed (I'm making that up) and the ball was in the air for 1.5 seconds! But most of the time, you could get that ball in time to just barely make a play, if you practice it. And practicing it could benefit you when the batter is a more realistic 2.9 runner or is some other hitter who accidently does the same thing.
If you just stand there and wait for the ball to come down, then snag it with your glove, reach in and grab it with your throwing hand, hop into position, and then throw, you probably aren't going to get even the 3.8 runner out. The third baseman on a chopper needs to do a bit more. This could involve a jump for the ball but that's probably relatively inefficient - it looks good but accomplishes nothing. This could involve barehanding the ball immediately into a throw. That involves working on the footwork required to set up while simultaneously charging the ball and practicing barehanding choppers. A coach could help a third baseman by initially soft tossing balls into the air in front of her, having her charge, grab and throw to first or shuffle to home for those bases loaded situations. Then assuming the practice infield is hard enough, a coach, with some practice, could learn to hit some good choppers for her to work the skill.
The second play for a third baseman to work in order to stand out from the crowd is similar to the shortstop's play. She dives to grab the smash hit to her right, just barely in fair ground, gets up and throws to first in time to nail the runner. An important variation of this is, again, when bases are loaded, to dive for the ball and come up throwing from her knees to home. I've seen this oplay accomplished and the crowd expresses their delight. I;ve also seen three quarters of the play get executed and then be followed by an errant throw. These skills need work with respect to footwork and throwing from knees when necessary. If you never work them in practice, I'll lay odds against these plays ever culminating in an out during a game.
Another play which a good softball player should make but which sometimes doesn't happen is the low pop-up behind first base. Many first and second basemen make an attempt to field this ball but they fail by a step or because they didn't dive for the ball. They missed it by a step because they didn't recognize the opportunity, didn't turn quickly enough, took bad steps to the ball, or otherwise just didn't have enough practice at this.
I strongly suggest going over the footsteps needed to make such a play and then repeating them, over and over again. Then I suggest running a drill for first basemen in which a coach tosses the ball behind first base, into both fair and foul ground. The player should try to make the catch and the coach should try to throw the ball just out of range. The player should be encouraged to dive when necessary - its opretty soft back there, isn't it? The coach should not take the approach that if he or she throws it out of the player's range, an adjustment into the range should be made.
The same play is important for second basemen. That is, sometimes the ball will be struck badly but fly beyond the potential reach of the first baseman, well beyond the possible retrieval by the rightfielder, and into "no man's land." In softball, these types of hits usually happen in the late innings with runner on third and two outs! If the second baseman can get there and make that catch, games can be turned from losses to victories. But the 2B has to know how to take a good route to the ball and when to dive. This can only be accomplished, other than in times of great luck, by practicing the play. These plays can be practiced the same way those for the first baseman can. Actually, it would be great to practice pop-ups into no man's land with 1B, 2B and RF all involved so the three fielders can get used to each other's abilities and ranges in order to avoid collisions. The SS and LF have a similar play in "no man's land." These could also involve the third baseman though most of the time, she's up so far that it seems unlikely that she'll get into that position.
A related play which could be worked in practice occurs when there is a gifted slapper up and she pops one into no man's land on either side of the field. These are really low, soft linedrives more than popups but they take basically the same route to the ball by fielders. If you've got a slapper defense set up, the outfielders are probably closer in. Maybe the SS is in tighter too, though somebody need to be situated so as to be able to go after balls hit right behind third. Some slapper D's I have seen put the 3B back by the bag and in those circumstances she can handle these plays. But when you have that gifted slapper who can lift the ball out beyond the infielder's reach down along the lines, your outfielders need to be able to make diving plays. And they need to practice these. I have often seen good slappers do this but I've never seen a team practice to defense it.
There are other diving plays for outfielders though the situations when diving is an acceptable strategy are important to go over. And teaching outfielders how to dive so as to be able to block the ball should they not succeed in catching it is equally important. The best outfielders are aggressive going after short liners. They often dive for them. But when the ball lands short of their reach, the best outfielders do not lay mired in their defeat. Instead, they tend to block the ball and keep it in front of them.
Catchers and other players have plays outside routine they can work on but I hesitate to call anything the catcher sees nonroutine. Still, many catchers practice throws to bases from a standing position but fail to work on them from their knees. I like to perform a drill in which a coach throws balls in the dirt to a catcher stationed in her regular catching position. Those are great to develop the necessary muscle memory for blocking low pitches. But why not add a throw, especially to third and also to second, from the down in the dirt blocking position? There are many occassions in which this play is necessary but if this is never practiced, a catcher is not going to throw out the runner as often as she might if they were.
Pitchers often get short shrift in infield drills. I've told you I like to run the drill where the pitcher throws a pitch to a catcher and a coach stationed just off the plate hits grounders at her feet, the pitcher fields them and throws to the various bases. I don't want to get into the habit of trying to really drill balls right back at her. These can result in injuries. I don't want to send three pitchers to the emergency room two days before a tournament. But the coach could hit fairly hard smashes using softees. I should note that these kinds of plays are probably more reliant upon the underlying athleticism of the pitcher than they are on any kind of practice. The more important aspect than fielding the balls is making the throw.
You have heard many people talk about the infielder's "internal clock." That is a developed sense of how much time she really has to make a play on the runner. This is displayed in all sorts of circumstances but never more so than in the type of plays we are talking about today. If the shortstop goes into the hole, dives, retrieves the ball and then makes a throw to first a full second after the runner gets there, thereby allowing the runner moving to second to proceed easily to third, that's a bad play. She has to develop the sense of when to hold the ball and when to make a throw. That sense can only be developed through repetition. So any of the drills we are talking about here could and should be performed with baserunners involved. That will help fielders develop that internal clock and avoid turning great plays into really bad ones.
There are other types of drills which can be worked into a practice which develop the skills needed to make great plays. We do some of these but altering a few elemtns of other drills can help build the extraordinary skills we seek. In softball the ground ball double play is a rarity. Yet, we run this in our ordinary infield practice because we recognize that the skills can be important in various circumstances.
When there is arunner on second and the batter drills a ball straight at the 2B or SS, most often the runner at second will find herself 5 steps from the back and off balance. She staggers, stops, and then returns as quickly as possible to the bag to avoid being doubled off. Most often, when this happens, the other middle infielder is off shooting craps or texting her girl friends. Everyone looks at the fielder who caught the ball, then to the runner trying to regain her balance, then over to the vacant bag. The opportunity for a double play is lost. And then we all look to the other middle infielder who stands there with an blank stare in her eyes and egg of her face. Sometimes, the other middle infielder has good instincts and runs to cover, arriving just before the baserunner. But the girl with the ball is waiting for her arrival before making the throw. The fielder beats the runner but the throw comes in well after she has returned.
If we practice this situation, it is just possible that we'll build a reaction which happens automatically in games. The two middle infielders are positioned properly and a coach hits light liners to short or second from a position around the pitcher's plate. One fielder makes the catch while the other races to cover the bag. The fielder with the ball leads the one covering the bag so she can catch the ball in full stride and double up the runner. These drills use the various types of throws one middle infielder might make to the other, overhand, dart, underhand, shuffle. The more we work this, the higher the likelihood we'll see one of those very convenient double plays when the score is tied 0-0 and we're trying to get an out in ITB.
You might be able to make any or all of these plays without ever having practiced them. Maybe you are just a great athlete who makes these sorts of non-routine plays routinely. Maybe you are a natural. Maybe you are just that good and your team all has ESP. They can read each other's thoughts, motions and body language immediately. They know when they don't have to go after a ball because Sally is going to get it. They can make double plays blind folded. Then again, even if you are that good, I have to wonder why practicing these things would hurt you.Labels: coaching, defense
Permanent Link:  Practicing To Make Great Plays
 
Tidbits
by Dave
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
I received a question today to which I gave a very brief answer. I recieve a lot of these, many of the same questions are asked multiple times, and I thought I would share a few since they often involve somewhat arcane questions which, taken as a whole, are likely to arise sometime during the course of a season.- Infield Fly Rule Overturned
One reader wrote in about an instance in which a pop fly was dropped by the second baseman after the plate umpire had invoked the infield fly rule. The umpires met and decided to overturn the infield fly rule because the ball actually went out beyond the infield dirt and fell in the outfield grass.
This should never happen. First of all, the infield fly rule occurs when, in the umpire's judgment, a fair pop-up can be caught by an infielder with ordinary effort, there are no or one outs, and runners are on first and second (or bases loaded). When called, the batter is automatically out and runners advance at their own risk. If the ball is caught, runners must tag up. If it is dropped, they need not return to base and instead can proceed to the next base if they wish.
The only circumstance which would change an initial infield fly ruling occurs when the pop-up drifts into foul ground. If, say, an infield fly drifts into foul ground and the ball is dropped, the batter gets new life - she is not automatically out. Because the invocation of the infield fly rule changes runners and fielders actions, it should never be overturned.
- When To Tag up
I received a question about a fly ball on which a runner tagged up. The complexity in the question occurred because the ball was initially tipped back into the air by one fielder and then caught by another. The runner tagged on the initial tip and proceeded to the next base. The fielder who caught the ball proceeded to throw to the base previously occupied in an attempt to lodge an appeal that the runner had left early. Umpires called her out because she had not tagged up after the ball was caught.
I am unaware of any rulebooks which diverge from the following though that is possible. The proper time to tag up occurs when the flyball is first touched. That is, a circus catch involving multiple players who in turn tip the ball in the air does not impact the appropriate time at which the runner must go back to the base and tag up. As soon as the flyball is initially touched, she can return to and then leave the base occupied.
- Pitcher's feet
Another question I get fairly frequently involves something about the pitcher's feet. These consist of several related and some unrelated issues. Here are the most frequent ones:
(A) Leap vs. Crowhop
Rather than give you the question since there are various iterations, here's my understanding of the two terms. A leap occurs when the pitcher's pivot foot leaves the ground. Most rulebooks have a requirement that the pivot foot remain in contact with the pitcher's plate until ball release. This requirement is met when she drags away from the rubber and maintains contact with the ground. Yes, that's an odd way of putting it but I believe that is the rule in almost every case.
A crowhop basically consists of a leap followed by obtaining a new point of impetus for the pivot foot. That is, the pitcher pushes off from the rubber, both feet are in the air, and she lands with the back foot before releasing the ball while also gaining a new pushoff point. These two are obviously somewhat related but are not the same thing sonce leaping involves and airborn foot and crowhopping involves a new pushoff point. The result, however, when called, is the same, illegal pitch.
(B) Two Feet on Pitcher's Plate / Backward Step
Several readers have written to inquire about whether the pitcher needs to begin with two feet on the rubber and/or whether she can take a backward step "before going into her wind-up." The answer is, it depends!
Basically, there are different pitching rules depending on the type of play. I don;t know all the rules by sanctioning body but I do know that some organizations allow pitchers to begin with one foot on the rubber and others require both feet to be on it.
High school rules can vary though I'm not entirely clear whether these vary from state to state. I believe they do. So any high school pitcher or coach ought to consult with their state's rulebook before proceeding. In my state, pitchers can start with one foot on the rubber and I have never seen an umpire call a pitcher for a badckward step.
Little League and Pony also permit a pitcher to start with one foot on the rubber but to my knowledge, Pony does not permit a pitcher to take any sort of backward step. I'm not sure about Little League.
Most other sanctioning bodies require a pitcher to start with both feet in contact with the rubber. I am not aware of any of these which tolerate a backward step. The NCAA is stricter than most, requiring half of each foot to be on the rubber. I have never seen a college pitcher take a backward step. I have observed many college pitchers slide their pivot foot across the rubber before striding and never seen an illegal pitch called for this. But from what I have observed, a pitcher who drags her foot across the rubber almost never keeps half the foot in contact during the drag.
(C) Walking into the pitch
Several folks have, over the years, written to complain about pitchers walking into their pitch. That would seem to be impossible when two feet are required to be on the rubber. In those instances in which only a single foot is required to be in contact with the rubber, I believe that foot must be the pivot foot. And I believe, walking into the pitch is usually prohibited. Yet I have seen this done many times in Pony and other play without there ever being a warning, let alone a call. I have seen it called in certain kinds of play but I have gone multiple tournaments with every pitcher walking in and not so much as a yawn from any umpire.
(D) Taking signs off rubber
Pitchers are supposed to either take a sign or mimick such an act before beginning the pitch. On some occassions, pitchers on my team have developed the habit of taking the sign behind the rubber, then stepping onto it, and then going into their windup. On some occassions, umpires have approached me privately and asked me to instruct our pitchers to take the sign from the rubber. Usually this is no big deal and nothing ever comes of it. But next game or tournament, our pitcher is again taking the sign from in back of the rubber! I would guess that I've seen more pitchers do this than take the sign on the actual rubber. And I've never seen an illegal pitch call due to this.
(E) Illegal Pitch!!!!
By far, the most frequent comment/question I receive involves someone seeing frequent bona fide illegal pitches not called. Often the writer sees one or two such illegal pitches called but could swear that every pitch thrown was illegal. I cannot account for this. That's been my experience as well. One reader noted that every pitcher on Team USA does something illegal on just about every pitch, gets called for the specific infraction on occassion, but does not repeatedly get called even though she does the same thing on every pitch. I can;t say that I saw the specific event every time somebody writes to me but I do understand what they are talking about. It is strange and I'm unclear what the meaning of this is. I think we've seen games in which the first several pitches or any particular string of pitches are called illegal in succession. I can't say that the pitcher ever changed the illegal aspect to the delivery. But for whatever reason, umpires have never in my experience continued to repeatedly call a pitcher for illegals until she changed or was removed. Draw your own conclusions.
(F) Single Ump
As a final comment about pitching rule enforcement, I am often confronted with questions about why an umpire did not call illegal pitch for some girl who was "obviously crowhopping." Often I ask the questioner whether there were one or two umps at the game. Most often there was one. To me, this calls into question the judgment of the questioner.
If you want to see the game from a single umpire's position, try it out. How would you like to be back there with some kid whipping the heavy ball at speeds requiring high school baseball reaction times, perhaps at a catcher of suspect ability, while also trying to call balls and strikes, get out to see close plays in the field, fielding various complaints from both dugouts, not to mention the peanut gallery, on some 100 degree day, for several hours at a time? Now with all that responsibility, the ump is supposed to also closely observe the pitcher's hands and feet? And make sure the two or three runners on the bases don;t leave early? Get real!
In general, if you have two umps officiating a game, the plate ump will usually keep his eyes on the pitcher's hands. The field ump will usually watch her feet. Unless something happens in which the pitcher makes some sort of mistake with her hands (brings them together twice or not at all), most illegal pitch calls will come from the field ump. Don't scream at a single plate ump even once because in your judgment the pitcher is crow hopping. Use a little common sense.
- Walked runner proceeds to second base?
One of my most embarrassing moments coaching softball occurred when one of my batters was struck by a pitch, jogged down to first, and I told her to go to second. We had a runner on third and when my runner took off, the catcher threw the ball to second. I started screaming at our runner on third to go. the umpire, barely maintaining his temper and sanity exclaimed, "coach, you can't do that on a hit batter." He was, of course, right. When the ball hits a batter, it's dead. I guess I had a mental hickup or something. I proceeded to dig a hole in the dirt and crawled into it.
Many folks starting out in travel ball or rec all-star play are initially unfamiliar with something called the "continuation play." basically, when a batter is struck with a pitch, yes, the ball is dead. But after a walk, everything remains live. So a walked batter can "continue" on to second base after a walk, with liability to be put out. This is often done in lower level, young play because, if the runner proceeding to second can induce a throw from the pitcher or catcher, the offensive team may be able to score a runner from third. I have seen this attempted at levels up to high school and 16U travel. But as girls arms become stronger and more reliable, it is a less common occurrence.
A friend once told a funny anecdote about one of the parents on a high school team. The fellow was one of those know-it-all types. When, during the course of a game, a batter was walked and she proceeded to second base, he began to shout, "she can't do that - the ball was already in the circle. That's not a proper interpretation and the umpire did not call her out. The father continued to shout until someone pulled him aside and explained the rule. He wasn't comfortable but at least stopped shouting!
Basically, when the ball is live and ends up in the circle, runners are permitted to continue to the next base without stopping or hesitation. If, after a walk for example, the ball arrives in the circle, it is still live but you can't get to first, jump off, and then begin juking in an attempt to get the pitcher to make a play on you. A runner can reach first base and immediately proceed to second. If the pitcher makes a play on her, all bets are off - the ball is now live. But if she ignores the continuation and does not make any sort of play, the runner on third cannot jump off again and begin juking. She should be called out for leaving base early.
The pitcher "making a play" includes any action which seems like she is making a play - specifically lifting the ball out of the glove into the throwing hand in a motion - that looks like she plans to make or fake a throw. In practice, if she does anything aside from lifting the ball into throwing position, including jumping around to position her body to make the throw, you will never see an umpire interpret this as making a play.
- Runner didn't turn to the right
I remember when I first got involved with fastpitch at any level, the coaches instructed girls to overrun first on grounders and then turn to their right so they couldn't be tagged out. That's technically wrong but really a minor error.
Some coaches want girls to run through the bag and then turn towards the fence to see if the throw got away. Many coaches want the runner to reach first and then immediately break down so as to proceed quickly to second if the ball gets away. They don't need the runner to see the ball hitting the fence - that's what base coaches are for. Instead, they want runners ready to advance should the opportunity arise. That seems entirely more reasonable to me. But that's besides the initial point.
A runner does not need to turn to the right to avoid being tagged out. No such rule exists. The rules require a runner overrunning first only to not make a motion towards second to avoid subjecting herself to liability to be put out. If she makes such a motion towards second, all bets are off. She is now liable to be put out and must get herself to some base.
I suppose that the misunderstanding about turning to the right or left involves some misinterpretation of a runner being put out. She motioned to second and got caught in a pickle or was otherwise put out. Somebody thought she had "turned the wrong way" and that's why they got her. But that's not what happened. What happened was she, in the umpire's judgment motioned as if going to second. There is no right way or wrong way to turn after overrunning first.
I think that's enough for one day. Have a great one!Labels: rules
Permanent Link:  Tidbits
 
Rule In A Pickle!
by Dave
Monday, August 25, 2008
Substantially revised 8/26Ed writes in to ask a question about a questionable ruling his team suffered recently as follows:"Runner on 3B. After the pitch, she draws a throw from catcher to 3B. Runner breaks for home, and is caught in pickle. She heads backs to 3B, then home. On her way home, catcher is about 5 feet up the line, and in basepath, and doesn't have the ball. The ball arrives to the catcher a split second before runner runs into catcher, and the runner knocks the ball lose. Umpire calls runner out for making contact, and tells us she has to slide.
What should the runner do in this situation? If a) she slides she'll never reach home; b) she runs around the catcher, she's out of the basepath; and c) she runs into the catcher, she's out for interference.
These are 14 y/o girls, playing ISA rules."
Before we begin looking at this, I want to address an issue contained in Ed's question. One of the alternatives Ed proposes is "b) she runs around the catcher, she's out of the basepath." I know we've discussed this before but, in case you missed it, running in the basepaths is not a golden rule - all runners do not need to always be in the basepaths. The only time one should be called out for failing to remain in the basepaths occurs when a runner leaves the paths in order to avoid a tag.
In practice, this rule can cause you trouble, particularly in pickles (run downs). I have never seen an instance in which a pickled runner leaves the basepath and in which she was not called out specifically for that reason. I've never seen an instance in which the ump called her safe after she left the basepaths and then, when the defensive team argued the call, the ump told them she left the basepaths in order to avoid contact. So, I do not believe this is an effective alternative. Still, what else are we left with? If she slides, she will never reach home and definitely be out. So let's look at what did happen and how the rules should be applied.
The ISA rulebook is available online here: ISA rulebook, pdf file.
To begin with, as a general softball matter, fielders are not allowed to stand in baselines, blocking oncoming runners, unless they are in actual possession of the ball in most kinds of play including Pony, NSA, ASA, etc. That constitutes obstruction. However, ISA seems to be a little different than other bodies in regards to this issue.
ISA rules state:
"RULE 7 - BATTER-RUNNER AND RUNNER
Section 6 - Runners Are Entitled To Advance Without Liability To Be Put Out.
B. When a fielder, not in possession of the ball, not in the act of fielding a batted ball impedes the progress of a runner or batter-runner who is legally running the bases."
There is no precise discussion of fielders and runners involved in a pickle or a fielder in the act of catching a thrown ball being allowed to block a base here. Essentially, if a fielder impedes a baserunner while not in possession of the ball, it looks like she committed obstruction.
However, Rule 7-6, B(4) states:
"If a defensive player is fielding a thrown ball and the flight carries or draws them into the path of the base runner, then it would not be constituted as obstruction."
So, while a fielder apparently has no right to stand in the path of the baserunner while not in actual possession of the ball, should the throw cause her to get into the baserunner's path and cause her to impede the baserunner while trying to catch the ball, that is an exception to the general rule. In this case, it would seem that the catcher is in the runner's basepath, impeding her, while trying to catch a throw. The throw didn't draw her into the baseline. She was there anyway. But, it can be argued, the throw drew her into the basepath. That's the way the umpire would probably see it. But in this case, it turns out that doesn't matter either with respect to the call the ump did make.
A further examination of obstruction rules reveals something else. There used to be a provision in almost every rulebook which stated that a fielder "in the act of catching a throw" could not be obstructing a baserunner. Many, if not most, rulebooks did away with this a while ago. These rules were changed to require the fielder to be in possession of the ball or risk being called for obstruction.
I remember sitting in a Pony Nationals manager's meeting maybe a year or two ago and being told to go back to our hotels and discuss obstruction with our players. The UIC told us that a fielder must have actual possession of the ball or would be called for obstruction. He noted that the rule no longer contained anything about "in the act of catching a throw." He insisted this change would be rigidly enforced. Of course, the next day, that precise situation occurred and our runner was called out!
But ISA rules regarding obstruction contain the following:
"Rule 8 Base Running
Section 5 Base runners are entitled to advance without liability to be put out:
B. When a fielder obstructs a base runner from making a base, unless the fielder is trying to field a batted ball, has the ball ready for a tag or is about to receive a thrown ball."
This provision is obviously inconsistent with what I just said and permits the catcher to be exactly where she was.
(Let me give proper credit here. When I first wrote the piece, I missed this aspect. I thought ISA had adopted the rule change to remove the "in the act of catching a throw" exception to the obstruction rule. My error was pointed out by Jeff who often writes to discuss points with me. Thanks Jeff.)
So, if the catcher was allowed to be in the baseline, if she couldn't be called for obstruction, because she was "about to receive a thrown ball," then I suppose we would have to look further and then ascertain whether the runner should maybe be called out.
In this case, the umpire claimed that the runner was out because "she didn't slide." It is fair to say that most of us have seen this call many times. I get confused by it however when I look to the rules. The general concept is what is known as the "collision rule." ISA rules on the issue are:
"Rule 8, Section 8 - The base runner is out:
T. When a defensive player has the ball and is waiting for the runner and the runner remains on their feet and deliberately, with great force, crashes into the defensive player; the runner is declared out. EFFECT: The ball is dead and all other runners must return to the last base touched at the time of the collision ..."
In the case we are examining, the umpire called the runner out because she didn't slide. The "runner remains on their feet" clause is the only place you are going to see any implied or other reference to a requirement to slide.
I get annoyed when umps invoke a "requirement to slide." It is always applied against me and never invoked in my team's favor!
I have heard the requirement to slide expressed many times. I have asked a number of umps about it and never received an adequate reply. Off the field, after games, what many of them will tell me is that sliding creates a presumption that the baserunner has done everything in her power to avoid contact - the collision rule does not operate then. They may refer to the rule noted above or another like it, depending on the type of play, and claim that it is their judgment whether the runner would have been out but for the collision. When you point out that the "on her feet" rule only applies when she is obviously out, you usually get shrugs and/or a desire to end the conversation. I have rarely seen a consistent application of this particular aspect of the collision rule. And, as I said, it semes like it is always applied against me, never for me.
A few years back, we had an argument with ASA umps on a force play at home. Bases were loaded, a grounder was dribbled back to the pitcher who fielded it, bobbled the ball slightly and then made a shuffle-pass to the catcher standing on the plate. The runner collided with the catcher who dropped the ball, possibly as long as half a second, maybe a little less, after she had caught and held it. The umpire called the girl safe at home. Somebody yelled, "she has to slide." That raised the hair on my arms and the back of my neck but not as much as the response from the baserunner who yelled to the crowd, "I don't slide!" This was a 16 or 17 year old girl who was a decent high school player and had at least 5 years of ASA tournament experience under her belt. The umpire had actually been a guy who had previously told me that runners have to slide always! Presumably they don't have to slide on force plays? Contact is permitted on those? Even when the runner is obviously out?
Clearly when the ball arrives to the base before the runner, is held, however briefly, by the fielder, and is dislodged as a result of the contact, the runner must be called out. That is precisely what the rules envision. Runners are not allowed to purposely dislodge balls. She would have (obvious to anyone besides the ump) been out but for the collision.
But I digress. The bottom line is the typical major league play in which the big guy rounds third, heads for home, the catcher awaits his arrival with ball in hands, and teeth gritted, is something we try to avoid in softball, something prohibited by the rules of the game. It may be great theatre in baseball but there are so many injuries caused by it, sometimes career threatening, that we should leave this sort of thing to other sports like roller derby. In fastpitch softball, you can't run down a catcher who is holding onto the ball long before you arrive.
However, more to the circumstances in the initial question, ISA rules also contain the following provision:
"Rule 7-6, B(5) If the ball, runner and the defensive player all arrive at the same time and contact is made, the umpire should not make the collision rule [interference or obstruction]. This is merely incidental contact."
Based on that, it seems pretty clear the umpire's ruling was erroneous. The phrase, when a runner is obviously going to be out and makes contact "while remaining on their feet," implies that a slide is necessary (though only when she is obviously going to be out). And in a pickle situation, it is hard for me to see that she would "obviously" have been out. "Obvious out" is in the eye of the beholder. Most umps fail to apply this conjunctive part of the rule. They want runners to slide, period.
Still, pickles should be different especially when fielders block the basepaths and umps are going to call runners out the moment they step outside the basepath. It is one thing if the throw arrives and the runner drives into her in an apparent attempt to knock the ball out. But when there is incidental contact, the collision rule should not apply.
In retrospect, not being at the particular game, I would guess the umpire in his or her judgment made the ruling based upon the runner staying on her feet reagrdless of the ball arriving at about the same time. He or she applied the rule different than it is expressed in the actual rulebook. But, I suppose that arguing the call, with rulebook in hand ,would not change the outcome except, perhaps, by making you observe the remainder of the game from the parking lot. I doubt if any dispassionate further analysis would have persuaded him or her to Ed's way of seeing things. Many umpires, regardless of the rules under which a contest is played, insist that there is always a requirement to slide.
When an ump invokes the rule where the runner is too far from home (or another base) to be expected to reasonably slide and still make it to that base, this really bothers me. And when such a ruling is made in a kind of play which specifically makes the collision rule inapplicable due to everybody coming together simultaneously, that really gets me juiced.Labels: interference, obstruction, rules, umpiring
Permanent Link:  Rule In A Pickle!
 
|
|
|